Higher education for a global 21st century

One of the things that I attempted through writing Deeper Learning in Leadership was to propose models of learning and leadership that would be relevant in the global environment of the 21st century. My experience prior to, and as I was writing, was exclusively U.S.A.-based and European. As I've become more aware of the Arabian Gulf region and the incredible things happening there, I've tried to figure out what's the same or different about higher education in these three geographic areas.

As my previous posts have noted, a lot is in the news regarding the emergence of higher education in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. However, this coverage is about the focus of these three independent, and in some ways competing countries. Interestingly enough, the three are adopting and adapting primarily U.S.A. models. But, is there a real understanding of both the strengths and shortcomings of higher education in the U.S.A.? Recent critiques of American higher education such as Derek Bok's Our Underachieving Colleges and the PBS documentary Declining by Degrees paint a pretty dire picture. At the same time these critiques are underway, new models are emerging that propose how to enhance learning both before and during the collegiate years.

One of the more interesting descriptions of how higher education can be enhanced came out of a study group convened by the American Association of Colleges & Universities. The College Learning for the New Global Century report critiques American higher education and proposes the importance of liberal education and integrative learning. The committee, which incidentally included Derek Bok, George Kuh, Ron Crutcher and others, combines ideas of globalism, experiential learning, integration of in and out of class learning, and the importance of creativity and the arts into a fascinating challenge for the future.

In addition to this U.S.A.-based perspective, Europe is also fashioning a global perspective to assure that their future is secure. The Lisbon Declaration of the European University Association defines a cooperative effort throughout Europe that will foster innovation, sustainability, and workforce preparation.

The question then becomes, with the Arabian Gulf investing proportionally more than either the U.S.A. or Europe into higher learning, and importing the best of both of these sources of "Western-style" learning, what is actually being imported and does it function in ways that truly enhance learning and build the capacity of the citizens of the U.S.A., Europe, and the Gulf? We live in interesting times where higher education appears to be at least one of the keys to a prosperous future. However, as new perspectives are proposed and resources pour into higher education, how do we figure out which models have the greatest promise? I proposed some ideas in Deeper Learning in Leadership but there need to be more. And, as leaders in higher education, we need to give our full and best conceptual energy to the challenge ahead. Will pushing the boundaries of global 21st century higher education be pushed independently and competitively or will they be pushed collaboratively and with global improvement the goal?

Legacy - granted or sought?

As I've read about (and have begun to observe) the explosion of development and education in the Arabian Gulf, I've begun to think of the question of legacy. While the improvement of educational and other opportunity for citizens of the UAE ("60 Minutes" covered Dubai on October 14,2007), Saudi Arabia (September 14, 2007, Chronicle of Higher Education), and Qatar are certainly good in and of themselves, all three of these countries are portrayed as developing a "legacy" for their people when the 21st century economy shifts from black gold (oil and natural gas) to other industries. So the question becomes, in what ways will this period establish a legacy and who determines it? Is the phenomenon of establishing a legacy granted or can it be sought?

Webster's Collegiate (1993; yes, I know using a dictionary is way old) defines legacy as "a gift by will" or "something transmitted by or received from an ancestor." This definition at least implies that one cannot seek to establish a legacy - it is granted by will to us or is received as a gift from an ancestor. Clearly, what leaders are attempting to do in the Arabian Gulf is to establish opportunities that will benefit the current and future generations of residents in the region. However, the degree to which the opportunities are eventually defined as a legacy depends on how it serves others. My own way of thinking of this is that we cannot seek to establish a legacy in, or through, our own lives; we are only granted a legacy through our service and as a result of our work and vision coming to fruition in ways that transcend us.

The reason this is important related to leadership is that it is fairly obvious that there are those who attempt to establish their own legacies through their acts of leadership. When we see this, how real or how transformative is the work? The work may have an impact but legacy is only granted when these acts transform and when they allow others to contribute as well. In many ways, it is only natural that we might all seek to be remembered for something we've done, something we've contributed to make the world better. My suspicion is that for those who seek the legacy, the moments of recognition are fleeting and hollow. The reward in this case is sought and most of the observers know what motivated the originator - self-aggrandizement. On the other hand, those who do not seek the recognition usually enjoy a longer and deeper appreciation for their work. Those who seek remain empty while those who simply serve are often recognized for their selfless contribution by the generations to follow.

Legacy - granted or sought? is a tough question. It requires self-examination that may not be all that comfortable. By examining, perhaps we can be freed when we let go of the desire to be recognized. The recognition comes of its own accord and lasts for many, many years and, if we are lucky, even generations. The Arabian Gulf is full of potential legacy and it will be fascinating to see how the broader globe embraces this amazing time in its history. In our own personal journeys, what potential legacies are either being granted or sought in this very moment?

Troubled and Thankful - in the same place?

I love being challenged to look more critically at my own experience and views. While I profess and embrace this a good portion of the time, I sometimes face challenges that I didn't expect and that I subliminally dismiss. That's been happening to me quite a bit this last week. I have found myself floating into a critical place that sees the problems but does not recognize my own opportunity to control my reaction to it - thus the title of this post "Troubled and Thankful - in the same place?"

As I prepare to leave Miami and to join the Qatar Foundation, I've noticed things in my current experience that have irritated or troubled me. It's not important to go into the details but let's just say that it has been primarily about the variety of responses I've had to leaving Miami and the new opportunities ahead in Qatar. Some colleagues and friends share the excitement I have and others are reserved, skeptical, or worse. Mind you, my emotional intelligence filters are probably set on "hyper-sensitive" right now so I recognize that my reactions have to be carefully examined. I have been aware of the need to monitor my own perceptions and to double-check them at every turn. Monitoring my reactions allows me to sort between what is about them versus what is about me. So, as an example, when someone reacts to my move by telling me about a visit they made to Qatar when in fact they actually visited Dubai (and this has happened a troubling number of times), and when their reaction dismisses the vision and purpose of Education City, I have to sort out what about the reaction is them or me. Further, if my conclusion is that at least a good portion of the reaction is about them, what will I do? Is there an opportunity to inform or to educate? Are there assumptions that will prohibit authentic discovery and exploration of our mutual questions?

If you've taken the "Darbi's Experiences Abroad" link, you know that my daughter has begun a process of more consistently finding and expressing thanks. This is based on a pretty cool area of research on thankfulness and how it impacts our lives. What I've realized from her posts and from this article is that looking for insights stimulated by thankfulness, we can actually turn many a troubling moment into an opportunity to know ourselves and to become more fully authentic in our interactions with others. As a very simple and pretty revealing example, I've reacted negatively on a couple of occasions when topics of interest to me and have been part of my work at Miami are carrying on without me. I was prepared to know that these conversations would take place after I was gone but not right under my nose - now! This kind of thing could have eaten at my soul until I began to understand the opportunities in thankfulness. It's actually very easy to do and it creates an alternative reality that is so powerful. When the conversations go on without me, that means that things I've valued actually mean something to others. It also means that capacity has emerged that will keep topics of deep interest to me alive. And, it also allows me the incredible luxury to spend this moment blogging about my reactions and it also affords the opportunity to think forward to the next step in my life in Qatar.

Woe! All of a sudden, a troubling feeling is replaced with thankfulness. The greater bonus is that the thankfulness opens yet unexplored opportunities to do things that really matter! What a lesson, stimulated by a little reflection and tempered with thankfulness.

U.S.A. and Qatar = Partners or Threats

Some very interesting things have been in the news lately about the Arabian Gulf region. Focus has been primarily on Dubai and Qatar for their entrepreneurial spirit and expansive growth. The Financial Times carried one article a couple of weeks ago and CNBC carried an interview with Qatar's First Deputy Prime Minister just today (October 2, 2007).

Browse these media commentaries and then think critically about the messages we are receiving. Are we encouraged to see the U.S.A. and countries like Qatar as partners or are we encouraged to see the growing and developing countries of the Arabian Gulf and East as threats to security in the U.S.A.? Specifically, the CNBC interview raises the specter of Qatar and other emerging Arabian Gulf countries buying out the west. Yet, the Deputy Prime Minister of Qatar raises the question of why the U.S.A. military forces can place their Arabian Gulf headquarters on Qatari soil while at the same time economists express concern that the U.S.A. doesn't know who it can trust when it comes to foreign investments in U.S.A. and European markets. So, which way is it? Some of these stories make it seem as if worldwide investing is suspect or threatening when, in fact, the U.S.A. has been doing the same thing for almost a century. The tables have turned and some other countries now own a piece of us (U.S.A.). Yes, it takes us potentially out of control of our own destiny. Yes, it means that others may prosper as much as we have in the U.S.A. But what's to fear if the U.S.A. has the capacity for innovation and competition that it says it has?

I don't mean for this post to be overly derogatory about U.S.A. media and interests. What I hope it does is to encourage us to consider the motivations of our commentators and public figures. I dare say that this is but one small example of the growing globalization that has now taken the planet. We are part of it and we need to figure out how to engage with other equal partners as we shape a future that can benefit greater numbers of citizens throughout the world.