I read and review a lot of books, some are great, others are
alright, and a few are barely worth the effort. Connectography: Mapping the Future of Global Civilizations by Parag Khanna (2016) is a must read particularly in a time when governments
and their leaders are searching for understanding about the future.
Khanna has recorded for TED Talks where he describes a world that should be understood more in terms of
connections and trade than how we have seen it in geography and maps. His
proposition is that connectivity will transform our world; geographic
boundaries, protected by governments and military defense, will become
irrelevant.
Informed by extensive travel and an amazing network of
colleagues around the world (see “Acknowledgments”), Khanna describes a hopeful
future where military superiority and wars will cease to be a threat, replaced
by supply chain and trade agreements that world leaders dare not violate if
they want to survive. Khanna, by contrast to many who deplore the mass
urbanization unfolding around the world, sees cities as the way to deal with
environmental degradation and income inequality.
“As the lines that connect us supersede the borders that
divide us, functional geography is becoming more important than political
geography.” (7% through digital text) Khanna predicts that nations will have
little power in comparison to cities that broker supply chains and trade at will,
carefully managing the flow (resources, goods, capital, technology, people,
data, and ideas) and friction (borders, conflict, sanctions, distance, and
regulation) within their purview. This world of evolving and permeable
boundaries, is more effectively leveraged through engagement than containment.
Tug-of-war for resources, innovation, products and services
is the new paradigm that Khanna says successful cultures must embrace. Within
this tug-of-war the most important goal is securing talent; whether grown
through education and training or acquired through immigration from other areas
of the world, the boundaries should be taken down rather then erected. That is
not to say that immigration can be totally thrown open but it does call for
modification of immigration processes and numbers so that talented people who
seek opportunity can flow to whatever place helps them achieve the goals they
have for themselves and their families. When and if migrant workers “are sent
back, they should be armed with skills and money to stabilize their own
countries to eventually diminish the urge to migrate.” (73% through digital
text) Perhaps the solution in the 21st century is to issue “global
passports” that are carried by those who move and work from country to country
and city to city, effectively undoing the “punitive effects of the accident of
birth.”
With 60% of Americans now believing that the “American
Dream” is out of their reach, 40% of young adults 18 to 24 see themselves
working outside of U.S.A. boundaries at some point in their future (26% through
digital text). This is a startling change in American’s view of their future
and it is one that, in itself, will help the country become more connected and
therefore influential. It is these expatriate and traveling diplomats who offer
the new face of America abroad. New York, Miami, Dallas, Los Angeles, San
Fancisco, Chicago, Boston, and Atlanta have been important to the U.S.A. but to
these “homes” the global cities of London, Hong Kong, Tokyo, Singapore, and
Dubai will be added. Infrastructure development will increasingly be central to
the success of any city that wants to be included among the global supply,
talent, and innovation centers. Simplistic calls to “bring jobs back to
America” fail to recognize that the more jobs and wealth that emerge elsewhere,
the more there are those who can afford to buy innovations that originate in
the knowledge economy of the U.S.A. where banking, insurance, software
programming, consulting, design, architecture, accounting, legal affairs,
health care and education are so lucrative. These innovation industries can
thrive in special economic zones (SEZs) placed around the world, providing more
opportunity to build connectivity while bringing mutual benefit to all.
According to Khanna’s predictions, “Connectivity is destiny”
and those individuals, businesses, and countries that do not embrace this
reality are at risk. In his concluding paragraph, Khanna advocates, “We need a
more borderless world because we can’t afford destructive territorial conflict,
because correcting the mismatch of people and resources can unlock incredible
human and economic potential, because so few states provide sufficient welfare
for their citizens, and because so many billions have yet to fully benefit from
globalization.”
Khanna is showing up regularly in Facebook posts and other
media. One New York Times article proposes a new map of America based on the trends identified in Connectography. Khanna’s message is
worth careful consideration, especially in the context of political strife
emerging all around the world and most graphically demonstrated in the 2016
U.S.A. Presidential contest.
No comments:
Post a Comment